Hi, Rob S. wrote:
> On 6 Jan 2004 at 8:24, mike.wilson wrote: > > > http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/channel/1/extra/new/display/985378 > > Oh my, someone's found a use for the multi-expo, isn't that a pretty pic :-) What a coincidence that I should trip over that image within minutes of your query, which I had not seen. Windmill shots and multiple shots of people moving are all I've ever seen this function being used for. I find it odd that the perpetrator of the linked shot decided to use such a cluttered foreground for what could have turned out to be such a striking .... er, image 8-) Leading to the next question - if there was enough wind to turn the blades, why is the vegetation unblurred? I see the very tops are moving but I would expect more. Maybe that is another exposure.... He lists nine exposures but I can only count 15 blades which, divided by the normal three, gives a five exposure shot. The conifers and birches/aspens could be separate exposures. mike
