Fred wrote: > > > I really don't think of it as a real auction - just a note that if > > someone wan'ts it and is dragging his heels and has more than that > > I'd love it, and I'm not going to do another note to the whole > > list on this. > > I understand, Ann. However, your original ad (in the "For Sale - > Pentax ring light/flash barely used" thread) ~did~ in fact say "I'll > keep bidders informed off list", and instead you actually started an > additional thread with your ongoing auction. Oh well, 'nuff said, I > guess...
Yeah... I meant I'd let people know if I got that $100 as the price to beat - oh well - anyway -- I'll keep the rest off the list - and in future put it differently but I sure don't have much left to sell along the line of camera stuff. The reason I like ebay, actually, is that I've always worried about charging people too much (probably why I'm poor!) for something, my anti-corporate world mind-set - so if I get a lot of money for something I've found for a tiny amount I don't feel guilty. ann > > > But even if you are being a crumudgeon, thanks for the added info > > I just thought of an additional advantage for the older AF080C, > although it's a totally subjective one (and some may consider it to > be either insignificant or even a disadvantage). I personally > prefer the ~looks~ of the AF080C, which is sort of "boxy" (like the > AF280T and the AF400T), and which (I think) is a much nicer match to > the older bodies I use the most (I usually use an LX for macro > shooting). In comparison, the newer AF140C is more "streamlined" in > appearance, which is not surprising, since it was probably designed > during the SF-1 era or the PZ-1 era. All I do now, when using the > AF140C out in public, is to put a bag over my head (the "unknown > Pentaxer") - <g>. > > I guess I could also add that $100 is not a bad price at all for an > AF080C. > > Fred
