--
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Something just occurred to me. With today's extremely high divorce rate, does most of the photographer's work end up in a dumpster sooner or later? Kind of a shame huh?
JCO
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message----- From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: wedding photography...ugh!
Not to mention you get exactly the same thing from all the guys and gals who have taken his seminars. When you hire Monte Zucker, what you get is Monte Zucker himself, or one of his employees. Not some kind of special available nowhere else photography. He has just carried name brand recognision to the maximum level in wedding photography.
And , BTW, most brides only have one big wedding, even if they get married several times in their life. That alblum is oridginal to her, never mind that every other bride has one just like it. She ain't like us photogs who look at thousands of photos an start seeing the similarities. Furthermore, you have to produce photos that she likes, not ones that you like. That is what being a pro is all about.
--
Mark Roberts wrote:
"Len Paris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Few of us can be Monte Zucker or Steve Sint.
I'd just like to take this opportunity to say that Monte Zucker's photos make me positively gag. I realize that he's very good at what he does but, man, it's like fingernails on a blackboard to me!
Whew! I feel much better having gotten that off my chest! (I feel like Mike Johnston on the subject of flowers or cats in photography!)
-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com
"You might as well accept people as they are, you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
-- graywolf http://graywolfphoto.com
"You might as well accept people as they are, you are not going to be able to change them anyway."
