Ah Ha.
And there in lies one of my problems.
As i mentioned in a reply,i have used the Adobe Gama adjustments on the monitor,and
sometimes i
use non Canon paper.Mostly Ilford Classic Gloss or Pearl. I notice a big difference in
the
prints between
Canon and Ilford.I have to adjust curves up so the image on the screen looks a bit over
exposed to get
something close to the Canon results.Its still a good picture,i think the Ilford gives
a
warmer tone,so
maybe thats coming in to play here.
Personally i like the Ilford results my self.
Dave
> But that's totally backwards. You want the print to
look
like
> what you see on the monitor. The moment you make a print
> with a different profile - perhaps as a result of changing labs,
> using a different paper, getting a different printer - you're back
> to square one.
>
> Len Paris wrote:
>
> > Yes, that's one way. You get a print, and the digital image it was made
> > from, and adjust the monitor until the digital image looks as much like
> > the print as it can. Better to save up a few bucks and get a Spyder,
> > though.
>
