[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Hmm.  That brings up another point -- not all buildings that 
> ought to have been preserved are lost to "progress".  
> Especially in the US, an awful lot of historical buildings 
> were made of wood, less durable than stone.  It's still 
> tragic to lose history, even when we can't blame greed for it.

Indeed, and bringing this back to photography, at least we can do our best
to record their existence this way.

Malcolm


Reply via email to