Well, I have to go along with this too, if you can afford it. I have 4 50/1.4's and use any of them more than my 50/2's and 1.7's combined. The M50/1.4 does make a wonderful combo with the ME Super, though I also like the K50/1.4. The M is probably easier to find and should cost a bit less.
William in Utah. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Familie Scheffler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 9:57 AM Subject: Re: Questions: M 50/2.0 - any good? > My first Pentax was a MX with the M-50/1.7 because it was cheaper than the > 50/1.4. I had it for almost 20 years. Two years ago I sold my M-50/1.7 and > buyed a used M-50/1.4 . It gives - in my eyes - a nicer rendition than the > M-50/1.7 which seems to be quite "scientific". Some time ago I purcheased a > camera with a M-50/2.0 .Of course I tried the lens, it wasn't bad, but I > simply like the M-50/1.4 more. So it had to go. > Conclusion: When I read your text I would recommend a M-50/1.4 - a wonderful > combination with a MEsuper (I have one, too.) > > Regards > Bernd > > ----original message---- > > From: Boris Liberman > a.. Subject: Re: Questions: M 50/2.0 - any good? > b.. Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 06:27:02 -0800 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > ---- > Hi! > > Kostas (and others), a bit of clarification. I have FA 50/1.7 lens that I > bought new along with ZX-L and Sigma zoom. However I want to have more than > one normal lens. I think that mostly I will keep FA 50 attached *all the > time* to ZX-L and M 50/2.0 will be used on ME Super along with other (manual > focus) lenses. > > But thanks for your responses. In fact, I am looking forward for more... > <FrinedlyG> > > Thanks. > > Boris > > > >
