Pretty much my experience. It's nice to have both, I wouldn't get rid of one over the other.
William in Utah ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 6:49 PM Subject: Re: Questions: M 50/2.0 - any good? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "William Johnson" > Subject: Re: Questions: M 50/2.0 - any good? > > > > Well, I have to go along with this too, if you can afford it. I have 4 > > 50/1.4's and use any of them more than my 50/2's and 1.7's combined. The > > M50/1.4 does make a wonderful combo with the ME Super, though I also like > > the K50/1.4. The M is probably easier to find and should cost a bit less. > > > > The K and M 50mm f/1.4 lenses are really completely different beasts. > The M has a creaminess to its image that the K doesn't have. > OTOH, I suspect that the K is the sharper, contrastier lens. > > William Robb > >
