That's a really beautiful picture. Rebekah ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:00 PM Subject: Re: Chromes,was: Hi there
> Hi, > > Kodachrome 64 is lovely film, I think. I use it for most of my colour > photography other than family & friends snaps. > > Here's one I don't think I've shown here before. One of my recurrent > themes is people reading; this is a nun in a monastery garden in > Northern Romania: > http://www.web-options.com/Moldovita1.jpg > > (with thanks to Valentin Donisa for driving me around!) > > But, since using the Kodak Supra range of print films, and also > scanning them, I'm beginning to suspect I like Supra better as an all > round film. The colours are more muted, with less contrast and a subtler > range of tones. Kodachrome can sometimes look rather brutal by > comparison. > > -- > Cheers, > Bob > > > Tuesday, January 13, 2004, 5:34:58 PM, you wrote: > > > Actually, I also enjoy Kodachrome 64 as it was the predominant film my > > father used to use, and he turns out such beautiful slides that I also have > > an appreciation for it. In fact, it was the first roll of film I used in my > > new Pentax, and I am still waiting for the slides to come back. Oh the agony > > of waiting!!! I hope to scan them and show you guys. > > Rebekah > > "The probability of someone watching you is proportional to the stupidity of > > your action."" > >
