For 22 cal. rifle and air rifle there are small commercial bullet traps available
at low cost, less than $50. They do an excellent job containing the bullets.
A switch on the trigger worked for me.>







Bob wrote:
>
>"I'm speaking from a position of almost total ignorance here, but
>surely a bullet is travelling 2 or 3 times faster than sound? Over the
>short distances involved is it really possible to do this?"
>
>bullet velocities can vary between 700 fps and 2300 fps for common guns.
>There are other more exotic ones that approach 4000 fps. I could make some

>custom loads that would be around 500 fps but the pictures may not be as
>dramatic.
>
>I'll be conducting these experiments in daylight at a rifle range unless I

>can figure out some way to build a bullet trap in my basement. <G>
>
>I would have thought a light or electric trigger would be better.
>e.g. fit the trigger or the hammer of the gun with an electrical gizmo
>to fire the flash.
>
>I will try to do this in daylight with flash equipment set relatively close

>to the target for maximum power. My camera will be a bit further away with
a
>telephoto lens (I don't want splattered fruit all over my lens!). I thought

>I'd stop the lens down to f/22 and shoot at maximum flash synch speed.
>Hopefully, the flash duration will be short enough to freeze the bullet and

>the small aperture will minimize the daylight exposure on the film. At 700

>fps a bullet travels 5.6 feet in 1/125th of a second so I have to eliminate

>daylight as a light source. This may require a box with the flashes poking

>through holes in the side. A flash duration of 1/50,000 of a second would
>give me bullet movement of .168". That might be the best I can reasonable
>expect. I don't know what the shortest possible duration of my flash
>equipment is. I have an AF400FTZ and a METZ 50 MZ-5. They can supposedly be

>operated together. Hopefully the combination in TTL mode will give me the
>short flash duration that I will need to make this work.
>
>This isn't something I'll be doing next week unless the weather gets a lot

>warmer.
>
>Thank you everyone for all your input and suggestions. Hopefully I'll be
>able to report back that I got some really cool shots.
>
>Tom Reese
>
>
>

Reply via email to