on 23.01.04 17:53, David Sprinkle at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > My experience with the *istD and the AF360 has been more of > problem. With the FA20-35 I'm getting 2 stop underexposure > with the lens at 23mm or less and close to normal exposure > above that. I've seen erratic under and over exposure with > my FA50 and the AF360. I've had better results with the > AF240FT. It sometimes happen, that exposure is not perfect in P-TTL mode. One thing that I noticed, is that it doesn't like too much white in photos - underexposure is then almost guaranteed - I use (+) compensation then. And of course, latitude of digital is more similar to slide film rather than forgiving negative. That's a reason for not so perfect exposure with flash all the time. If you make you feel better, my friend made many photos during christmass 2003 with his EOS 10D and 550 EX flash and had similar to my results - some photos happened even to be more badly underexposed. After all, it is usually quite easy to correct highlights via levels in graphics software.
> The AF360 was in P-TTL mode when I got these results. Does > anybody get the flash confirmation in the viewfinder with > AF360? I don't but I do see it with the AF240. No, I don't get flash confirmation when in P-TTL too, but it is here in TTL mode. -- Best Regards Sylwek
