Yes. If you compare technical image quality, the digital cameras really are too expensive. The problem is, that we can suspect the camera makers eventually will stop developing analog cameras. I mean, the *ist already has better features (AF, AE etc.) than the MZ-S, but I guess the analog *ist is kind of similar to the *ist D (11 focus points, 16 segment measuring)? THew *ist selling at a fraction og the *ist D (700$ i Denmark - *ist D selling for appr. 2000 $ in Denmark and appr. 1900$ in Germany).
Soon 8-10MP will become the professional standard, Sharp made a 6MP mini CCD for P&S cameras. Sony allready made a 8MP semiprofessional SLR - selling for appr. 1000$. And yes, resolution matters. But other features do as well. All the best Jens, Denmark -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 25. januar 2004 13:19 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: DIG: how many? by the time one comes down to the price you want to pay, the ones that are worth getting will still be too expensive. resolution isn't everything, but when there isn't anything else different that aids taking the picture, then more resolution is what matters. Herb.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lon Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2004 7:15 AM Subject: Re: DIG: how many? > It strikes _me_ that digi SLRs are still too expensive, > and will come down in price. -Lon
