Hi! As I mentioned some time ago, I have a friend who's a member of one of local (remote from the though) camera clubs. Started with Pentax and now he's shooting 6x6 (cm) medium format. He even has this foldable Agfa camera...
Anyway, fair part of club members has gone digital. The shoot real huge amount of shots, several times more than they could possibly do with film. He constantly keeps telling me about this and that photog who came to show their stuff and most of it sucked. Probably you Bill and you Shell and some others here could still discern (right word?!) good stuff from crap. So you wouldn't show bad stuff to the public. But these guys seemingly could not. I can understand them. They probably have several similar images shot at burst or several similar images just because they are similar. They also have a lot of shots to go through, so they get tired and just let it be... For the record last year (2003) I shot 40 36 exp films making it 1440 shots all together... I am yet to make order in all this mess. Indeed, one of the dangers of Digital Side <grin> is amount... versus cost... versus quality. Your points are well taken. Boris
