William Robb wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "mike.wilson" > Subject: Re: The problem with digital > > > Hi, > > > > WR wrote: > > > > > And I got, I am sure, a good picture that I wouldn't have gotten on > film, > > > perhaps even more than one. > > > > How so? Speed/sensitivity change? > > Luck of sheer numbers. > Something out of those extra 200 frames should be good....
Ah. I thought you were talking about a specific "frame". Now I merely think you are jesting...... m
