everyone has said this every 5 years since forever. doesn't make it true.

Herb....
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: Digital Photography


> What I've seen is just the opposite wrt to creating strong
> photos and powerful images.  
> The overall quality of photographs has dropped substantially
> in the past decade or so, and while digital cameras are not
> the only reason for this, they are one of the prime
> contributors.  Do you know that there are people (and I bet
> some are on this list - in fact, I KNOW some are on this
> list) who have NEVER seen a gorgeous B&W silver print, whose
> only exposure to photographs have been ink jet prints,
> images from the web, photos appearing in magazines and
> books, and color minilab prints made with consumer quality
> (i.e., low quality) zoom lenses mounted on cameras using
> automatic everything.
> 
> While those things, individually, will not cause a drop in
> quality, taken collectively, and in a climate where MORE
> MORE MORE rather than BETTER BETTER BETTER is rampant,
> quality will suffer.  We are, because of automation and the
> need for speed, entering the age of the generic photograph.


Reply via email to