Hi, > It's definitely a money issue. No more chemicals, no more processor > maintenance, no more film expenses. And in newspaper photography, > where we used a 180 dpi resolution for photos but could go to 150 dpi > without any noticeable difference, quality was never the top > consideration.
It seems to be a question of scale then. <namedrop size="gargantuan"> I heard the story I related about the World Cup picture being printed in Australia 7 minutes later directly from Ulli Michel, the Global Pictures Editor for Reuters. He was concerned with speed, not cost. </namedrop> -- Cheers, Bob
