That does look pretty impressive, and the price seems to be right... Much better than what the Microtek produces. Any problem with dust? My test scans on the Microteck seemed to be chock full of stuff, even after blowing off the scanner plate, the film, etc...
Shot #2 is actual pixel size?
- MCC
At 09:14 PM 2/8/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Hi Mark,
I don't think you can beat the Epson 3200 with anything in its price range. The Epson without the extra software is about $350. If you're in the Detroit area one of these days give me a call, and I'll get together with you and show you some prints. In the meantime I've posted an example on PhotoNet. The first shot is a mild crop of a 6x7. The second is a detail from the first frame.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2116653&size=lg http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2116655&size=lg
On Feb 8, 2004, at 8:25 PM, Mark Cassino wrote:
Plan B would be to go with an Epson flatbed.
-----
Mark Cassino Photography
Kalamazoo, MI
http://www.markcassino.com
-----
