Nice tests thanks. Drawback to using the istD is it wont reveal the differences if any in the corners of the images when using film or a full frame sensor. But that can wait for the istD-II I guess.
Id like to see the same tests but with the 120mm F2.8 SMCT or 120mm 2.8 SMCK vs the VL 125mm F2.5! Would be a more fair test with closer focal lengths and speeds..... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 10:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtlander 125mm F2.5 SL On 10 Feb 2004 at 12:04, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: > Omg! Rob those results make the Pentax-A 135mm look like a piece of CRAP!!! Hi Tan, It's all in your perspective. It just proves that the V is superb but the P is infinitely better at f1.8 too :-) Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
