> Most of these shots seem to have been executed > against questionable backgrounds.
What's "questionable" about 'em? Fred
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtl?nder 125m... Tanya Mayer Photography
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtl?nder... Rob Studdert
- RE: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtla... J. C. O'Connell
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtl?... Tanya Mayer Photography
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtl?nder... Rob Studdert
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtl?nder 125m... John Mustarde
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtl?n d... Rob Studdert
- RE: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtl... J. C. O'Connell
- FS: 105/2.8 (Was Re: SMC Pentax-A* 13... Paul Stenquist
- Re: FS: 105/2.8 (Was Re: SMC Pent... Shel Belinkoff
- Re: FS: 105/2.8 Fred
- Re: FS: 105/2.8 Paul Stenquist
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtl?nder 125m... Scott Nelson
- Re: SMC Pentax-A* 135mm 1:1.8 vs. Voigtl?nde... Peter Alling
