>Btw, does anyone think the name "konica minolta" looks stupid? Are they really going to make it the final product? :-o

awful isn't it. I wonder how long it will be till the Minolta part is dropped and they will just be Konica. How could anyone say they are a proud Konica owner :-(

Alan

Alan Chan wrote:

Anything is possible, but the question is, "Will Pentax do it in the near future?" The same question has been asked countless times over the years and the answer is always "no". Btw, does anyone think the name "konica minolta" looks stupid? Are they really going to make it the final product? :-o

Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan

With in body anti-shake (to get back on topic, this will show Pentax
that it is possible - and that perhaps they do not need to look at IS
lenses anymore)...

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0402/04021220maxxum7digital.asp


_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca







Reply via email to