Well, being able to shoot both digital and film cameras, I guess film actually needs some justifying. I only use film when it's necasary. Jens
-----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 13. februar 2004 05:25 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: justifying film On 13 Feb 2004 at 11:01, Sung Nee wrote: > If I may point my fellow list members to this article, which concluded that 10mp > is the theoretical equivalent of 35mm film, but around 6mp is the practical > equivalent: > > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/dq.shtml > > I guess Pentax arrived at the same conclusion. > > There is no need to remind me that this is only some guy's own opinion > couched in convoluted mathematical jibberish. I am, nevertheless, persuaded by > it. Consider that the defining element in the film side of the debate is the resolution of the LS-8000 there are better scanners. BTW I couldn't find the pics that you posted to leica-gallery.net. Cheers, Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
