Hi, Sven,

Very pretty. It's probably just because I'm so used to seeing pancakes on MXen, but somehow it just doesn't look "right" on the *istD. I could probably get used to it if I tried, though <g>.

I only used one for a couple of weeks or a month on my MX, but I didn't have it at 2.8 very often. It was mostly at f22, so I could hyperfocus on the street. That made it essentially a focus free lens. I thought it was sharp enough that way, but as I keep saying, sharpness isn't such a huge thing for me, so I don't think I'm too discriminating in that regard,

Every time I see a *istD, I'm reminded that it's by far the prettiest DSLR on the market, by far.

cheers,
frank

"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer




From: "keller.schaefer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: AW: LX envy
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:36:13 +0100

Here is the *ist d + pancake:

http://www.mynetcologne.de/~nc-kellersv2/pancake.jpg

Mine is not too good wide open though. At 5,6 it is o.k.


_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/bcomm&pgmarket=en-ca&RU=http%3a%2f%2fjoin.msn.com%2f%3fpage%3dmisc%2fspecialoffers%26pgmarket%3den-ca




Reply via email to