On 18 Feb 2004 at 21:25, Nick Clark wrote:

> Does Pentax Photolab make a better job of conversion to TIFF than the camera, or
> are they equivalent? I use Photoshop 5LE and Elements.

The advantage of post processing the file is that you have greater flexibility 
and control. IMHO the quality isn't as good as the in camera TIFF, the edges 
are definitely poorer. However the Photolab program is a dog, point it towards 
a sub with a couple of hundred RAW images and it'll gag. It's just crap.

Unless you have an library program that can understand Pentax RAW files then 
you are stuck with it for previews however at least the RAW plugin for PS CS 
now provides a viable alternative for post processing.

Cheers,


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998

Reply via email to