> > My ideal camera would have front and back half-embedded spinner wheels > > (like Nikon, sorta like Canon) if it didn't have a traditional shutter > > speed dial. > > That would be the PZ-1p, then. Or the *ist-D, of course.
I Gotta look at the PZ-1P then, or presumably the *ist film camera. > Often, I hope Pentax made a PZ-1n between the MZS and the Z1-p. But, if > there was such an body, it won't be a MZS... > > In a way, I think that the *ist-D (how do you prononce it in english ???) > was a PZ1-n but in a digital way. I must say that being used to Nikon I DO find the *ist-D control layout nice (other than the wheels being backwards...), nicer than much of what happened prior to the *istD in the AF era. Of course I never liked the buttons on the ME and Super Program series when I was using them every day. It's interesting that user interface differs so much now. Back in the days when everything was mechanical, everything but Olympus (and mechanical nikkormats) had pretty much the SAME user interface--those three controls that someone mentioned a couple days ago. I'm not even going to mention what happens when MENUS come into the picture... DJE
