Kenneth Waller wrote: > > I don't have the *istD (yet), but I can tell you that I can get totally > acceptable 8X10's from my Optio S. I haven't compared the digital print > with a wet print, but the people in my office are blown away by the output > of my Optio S and my Epson Stylus Photo printer.
Okay, Okay, I'll ask the obligatory question: "You mean you got a great 8x10 print from an Epson Stylus?" Which Stylus? What application feeding the printer driver? I presume an S4 and an Epson Stylus 820 will suffice? <g> I'll have to try that! keith > For larger output, the answer to your question will depend alot on the > nature of the image itself, the capture resolution and the printer > resolution. My guess is you will need more than 6mp capture to consistently > get great 16X20 digital prints (without interpolation). > Kenneth Waller > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Frankie Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: *istD for print photo > > > > > I would like to know whether the *istD could give better (or equivalent) > quality print photo (8x10 size or larger) for portrait and landscape when > compared with film. Any opinion?
