Actually its the original Epson Stylus Photo vintage about 1997 using Photoshop 5.0, mainly using their photo Paper. Paid about $300 for it then and have run 1 to 2 thousand prints from it without (knock wood) any problems. As for the camera its the Optio S (3.2MP) at the highest resolution. If you're not shooting for the Web why would you shoot at lower resolution? Kenneth Waller ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Whaley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: *istD for print photo
> Kenneth Waller wrote: > > > > I don't have the *istD (yet), but I can tell you that I can get totally > > acceptable 8X10's from my Optio S. I haven't compared the digital print > > with a wet print, but the people in my office are blown away by the output > > of my Optio S and my Epson Stylus Photo printer. > > Okay, Okay, I'll ask the obligatory question: "You mean you got a great > 8x10 print from an Epson Stylus?" > Which Stylus? What application feeding the printer driver? > I presume an S4 and an Epson Stylus 820 will suffice? <g> I'll have to > try that! > > keith > > > For larger output, the answer to your question will depend alot on the > > nature of the image itself, the capture resolution and the printer > > resolution. My guess is you will need more than 6mp capture to consistently > > get great 16X20 digital prints (without interpolation). > > Kenneth Waller > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Frankie Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: *istD for print photo > > > > > > > > I would like to know whether the *istD could give better (or equivalent) > > quality print photo (8x10 size or larger) for portrait and landscape when > > compared with film. Any opinion? >
