Party Poopers:-)<vbg>
I think this is great. A new rush so to speak has happened.I can finally show some of
my
Nikon and
Yashica Mat camera pic's that i like, that cannot go on the PUG.Others have shown pic's
from film and
digi cameras that are non Pentax too.
I find this very refreshing.
The worlds to fast today.Slow down for a moment and enjoy some might fine pictures from
some very
nice and talented people from all 4 corners of the world,and Regina too.
Dave
Sorry for the dig WW but i am a Riders fan and plan to buy a share when my next pay
cheque
clears.
Dave Again
>Shel said
> Rob Studdert commented that the PAW postings are
becoming
> too much, and suggested that we only post PAW pics on
> Friday.
>
> Phtooey! I say. The pics should come as the mood strikes
> you, when you have a good one you want to share, or when you
> have one you're looking for comments about. And why just
> one a week? This is a photography list, pictures, images,
> photographs ... call 'em what you will, we communicate
> through our photos.
>
> I've noticed that people who rarely post messages have
> presented us with some photos. Perhaps some of those people
> find it hard to express themselves for one reason or another
> .... this list can be intimidating some times, the
> discussions technical in nature and hard to follow, so the
> posting of pictures is a great way for some people to
> communicate and share their thoughts and feelings with the
> list.
>
> I've also noticed that some of the more tech oriented people
> haven't participated in the PAW yet ... after all their talk
> about how valuable the technical and high tech side of gear
> and peripherals is to making a good photo, I haven't seen
> any of those good, high-tech produced pics. C'mon guys,
> join the party, show us your stuff.
>
> Again, I'm not the moderator of the PAW, but my opinion is
> to let the photos flow <LOL>. If they are going to be
> restricted to being posted only on a specific day of the
> week, then I suggest that discussions about digital gear and
> technical discussions, and discussions about flash, or film,
> and even OT discussions, be limited to but one designated
> day per week.
>
> Anyway, Rob's comment was in response to Raimo's comment
> that the list traffic was a bit heavy and that he was going
> to unsubscribe for a while. I don't believe Raimo said
> anything specific about the PAW being the reason for his
> decision ... don't have the message handy so I'm not sure.
> But, regardless, this has always been a heavy traffic list,
> and over the years many people have dropped off because of
> the message count. That's just the way it is. So, let's
> not pick on the PAW, especially since it's in its infancy.
> It'll develop its own place on the list in time ... and I
> bet it will still be overshadowed by tech talk.
>
> Just my dos centavos ...
>
> shel
>
