On 23 Feb 2004 at 17:59, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > Anyway, Rob's comment was in response to Raimo's comment > that the list traffic was a bit heavy and that he was going > to unsubscribe for a while. I don't believe Raimo said > anything specific about the PAW being the reason for his > decision ... don't have the message handy so I'm not sure. > But, regardless, this has always been a heavy traffic list, > and over the years many people have dropped off because of > the message count. That's just the way it is. So, let's > not pick on the PAW, especially since it's in its infancy. > It'll develop its own place on the list in time ... and I > bet it will still be overshadowed by tech talk.
I'm all for the PAW or PAD or whatever you'd like to call it however I too hope that it settles and technical talk abounds once again. Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
