First I want to thank you all who commented on this shot.

BL> To me it looks like the image that just is. It does not have much
BL> emotion or meaning in it. It is just an image of a nice looking
BL> building unfortunately taking on a day when skies were rather dull
BL> looking.

It was taken intentionally on an overcast day. So it is not a
snapshot, neither was taken on a trip, it is right here in Oradea;) I
wanted to take it on an overcast day to eliminate some very unpleasant
shadows. So I had to say bye-bye to the nice looking deep blue sky. It
was a compromise, but I thought it is better to sacrifice the sky
rather than the nice small arhitectural ornaments.

BL> I think I would take out the little antenna just on the right to the
BL> flag on top of the building.

With all respect Boris, I wouldn't do that... it is just part of it,
and I don't feel it right to take it out. But I may consider "faking
the sky".

ft> I must say, it's a well executed snapshot.  Nice and sharp, the colours of
ft> the tower are nice.  As Boris said, however, the sky is really washed out
ft> and not at all attractive to me.  It needs to be blue.  Or there should be
ft> some clouds or something angry to make it interesting.

Thanks Frank, but as I wrote before it is not a snapshot. Maybe I
don't know how to make good arhitectural photos, that is. You and
Boris made me think to correct the sky in Photoshop. But I'm still not
sure... I am reluctant to digital alterations.

All this reminds me a joke I read earlier on PDML. An american couple
went in Ireland on vacation, and the wife yelled that 'Ireland does
not look like photos of Ireland'. The point is, I don't intented to
make it look nicer than it actually is.

g> Frank is not much into architecture (GRIN). I think it is a nice well done shot.
g> Sometimes a clear record is all that is wanted, not all photos have to be artsy.
g> Some of the folks on the list ought to look at a good book on architectural
g> photography, but not one on advertising architectural photography which tends to
g> be artsy pictures of buildings.

Thank you Graywolf, at last some encouraging words, so I won't give up
to shoot architecture:) I am not much into architecture myself, but I
think it is an interesting subject, and I want to learn more.

Attila


Reply via email to