Exactly. When I first commented on the photo I wanted to see more detail in the highlights. I haven't totally changed my mind, but I do see how the highlights give it a somewhat haunting image, which works in this photo.
David Madsen mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.davidmadsen.com -----Original Message----- From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 11:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: first post XP-2 and PAW The nicest thing about this is exemplified in just this situation: a couple of people like something, others don't, but what the dialogue does, at least for me, is to allow one to take another look at a photograph through, as it were, another's eyes, perhaps seeing something that was overlooked, or seeing the same thing differently, and, in so doing, perhaps learn something or expand one's vision. David Madsen wrote: > > I couldn't agree more, Frank. That we all have different opinions is why > this is fun. As for blown out highlights, sometimes they add to the photo, > sometimes they don't. > > David Madsen
