Interesting result. As you mentioned in your text, your scanner may be the limiting factor for your MZ-S => Fuji Superia => Epson 3200 flow. The imaging system in the scanner probably isn't sharp enough to capture all of the detail in the film. I have an Epson 2450 (the older version of the 3200). A few months ago, I shot some resolution targets with a medium format film camera and scanned them with my 2450. I saw a lot more detail in the film with a 30x microscope than was visible in the scanned results. It would be interesting to take your film and have it commercially scanned with a high-end scanner to see how much better (if at all) the results are compared to your 3200.
--Mark
Hi all
I have now posted my Analog versus Digital test shots. I know that this
thread is not about this. But I was hoping to maybe inspire some of you guys
to make similar tests, using the *ist D and an analog Pentax camera, maybe
even using the same lenses, or lenses of comparable quality and resolution.
Please visit: http://gallery50012.fotopic.net/c132825.html
You may consider this a PAW.
All the best Jens Bladt
