not only that, but use the best film and digital settings, i.e. ISO 50 not ISO200. jco
---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J.C. O'Connell mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----Original Message----- From: Mark Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 6:24 PM To: pentax-discuss Subject: RE: *ist D sensor and 35mm lens resolution Jens, Interesting result. As you mentioned in your text, your scanner may be the limiting factor for your MZ-S => Fuji Superia => Epson 3200 flow. The imaging system in the scanner probably isn't sharp enough to capture all of the detail in the film. I have an Epson 2450 (the older version of the 3200). A few months ago, I shot some resolution targets with a medium format film camera and scanned them with my 2450. I saw a lot more detail in the film with a 30x microscope than was visible in the scanned results. It would be interesting to take your film and have it commercially scanned with a high-end scanner to see how much better (if at all) the results are compared to your 3200. --Mark >Hi all >I have now posted my Analog versus Digital test shots. I know that this >thread is not about this. But I was hoping to maybe inspire some of you guys >to make similar tests, using the *ist D and an analog Pentax camera, maybe >even using the same lenses, or lenses of comparable quality and resolution. > >Please visit: http://gallery50012.fotopic.net/c132825.html >You may consider this a PAW. > >All the best >Jens Bladt
