True. I guess a lot of people buy a digital camera just to be at the cutting
edge of things. And to get rid of expensive film - and the can redo faulty
shots right away. They can even see if the results are OK at a glance - so
they don't have to know anything about photographing in advance - they can
learn fast by trial and error. It's not because of a better image quality.
All the best

Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt


-----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 12. marts 2004 16:31
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)



----- Original Message -----
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Pentax (film) vs 5MP (SONY)


>
> There are still many people who do not want to fool around
> with digital cameras, they are far more complicated to use than
> the film point and shoots to use properly for the non-hobbyist.
>
>
This is one of my ongoing work related problems with digital cameras.
Daily, I have to deal with people who have files that are too small,
incorrect formats, badly set up sharpening parameters, etc.
If they can do it wrong, odds are, they will.

Topping it off, for the non computer user, they are getting all their
files printed anyway, which negates the only possible financial
advantage of the digital camera.

William Robb




Reply via email to