Hi,
that's a pity. We have good Kodachrome processing over here, on the
whole. And with the professional films they offer an overnight service
by post, and a 1 1/2 hour service if you go to the lab yourself. I
guess I've been spoiled compared to the rest of the world :o) It's a
real shame it's picking up such a reputation in the US, because it
really is nice film.
---
Bob
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thursday, April 05, 2001, 6:13:30 AM, you wrote:
> Hi Bob ...
> Kodachrome is not an easily acceptable option at this point. The
> quality of processing here has been spotty, with more and more
> people complaining about dirty slides and poor processing results.
> Further, the film has to be mailed "somewhere" and the turnaround
> time is not always quick or predictable. I need something that I
> can get processed quickly and, if I need to reshoot something, I can
> then do that quickly as well. Some of what I'm shooting may be
> transitory. With color neg film I can shoot in the morning, have
> the proof prints ready by lunch, and be shooting again before tea
> time. Plus I'll always know where the film is and who's processing
> it.
> Of course, I could shoot the K200 as you suggest along with the
> color neg. That might be a workaround. I'll give it some thought.
> But it will be a lot more time consuming and costly than using the
> neg.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
