You original post must have been one of the ones bounced when hotmail was down on Friday.
Anyway, I like the second one. The wingtip being cut off doesn't bother me a bit. I think it's a much more dynamic shot than the first is.
Both are good, the second better, IMHO.
cheers, frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Boros Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PAW: more vultures Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 13:31:38 +0200
Hello Christian,
Both photos are very good, the first is a better composition, the second has more detail. I like them both and can't decide which one is better. It's a pity that wingtip got cut off.
Attila
Friday, March 12, 2004, 5:13:26 PM, you wrote:
C> Sorry, it's two shots, but I'd like comments on "which is better" (if any).
C> http://home.mindspring.com/~c_skofteland/id7.html
C> I'm impressed with the level of detail (especially the full-sized images).
C> I'm a little disappointed that I cut off the wingtip in the second image.
C> Shot with the D and Sigma 300/4 + 1.4x TC, hand-held, iso 400, f5.6ish and
C> really fast shutter speed. Resized for the web but not cropped.
C> Thanks!
C> Christian
_________________________________________________________________
STOP MORE SPAM with the MSN Premium and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines
