Hi, Sunday, March 14, 2004, 11:20:29 PM, Anders wrote:
>>Whoever thought "Re:" had anything at all to do with replies? It means >>'About' and you use it - at least in traditionl paper correspondence - >>on any subject line, not just replies. In email subject lines it >>serves no useful purpose whatsoever. It's just noise. Junk. >>Interference. > The use of "Re: " (note the trailing space) in the subject line of > replies is regulated in the Internet standard document RFC 2822, > section 3.6.5: I know. And it's still a crap idea. The word 'Subject' covers all the territory that 'Re:' covers. 'Re:' is entirely redundant. -- Cheers, Bob
