Hi David .... What didn't your friend like about the Nikon scanner? Which Nikon scanner(s) did he use? What did he like better about the Minolta?
I've got no problem with huge files .... the bigger the better, IMO, as long as I can make small files for cataloging or "proofs" as well. shel David Mann wrote: > > On Mar 20, 2004, at 04:55, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > > > The money, while important, isn't the main issue, as > > whatever scanner I purchase will be a long term investment. > > Isn't the 5400ppi of the Minolta an interpreted resolution? > It is the optical resolution. I have a friend who has one - he tried > out both the Nikon and the Canon 4000ppi scanners and he wasn't happy > with them. He loves his Minolta despite the huge files he ends up > with. > > Cheers,
