My hand is raised too but I don't think a camera without a built in flash
would sell in the popular market place. Perhaps a better solution would be
to move the RTF away from the viewfinder. I recently read that the MZ has a
"penta-mirror" not a pentaprism. Is that the cause of the poor viewfinder
performance?
Peter
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Johnson
> Sent: 06 April 2001 04:36
> To: pentax discuss
> Subject: ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2.8 Fisheye)
>
>
> Todd wrote;
>
> >The ME does have a really nice viewfinder.
> >Considering how small the ME
> >is, I don't buy the excuse that a viewfinder like
> >this can't be put into a
> >AF camera because it would make the camera too big.
> >The magnification is
> >.98x, which I think is the highest of any Pentax 35mm
> >SLR? IIRC the MX has
> >.97x and the ME Super has .95x.
>
> I'm with you on this one. I think you're right about
> the magnification being higher than any other Pentax
> SLR, _and_, to my knowledge, it is the smallest full
> frame regular production 35mm SLR ever made. Show of
> hands: How many folks would ditch the RTF on a ZX-5n
> (or MZ-S for that matter) for a .98x magnification
> viewfinder? Mine's raised.
>
> Thanks,
>
> William in Utah.
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
> http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
>
>
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
