>I'm with you on this one. I think you're right about >the magnification being higher than any other Pentax >SLR, _and_, to my knowledge, it is the smallest full >frame regular production 35mm SLR ever made. Show of >hands: How many folks would ditch the RTF on a ZX-5n >(or MZ-S for that matter) for a .98x magnification >viewfinder? Mine's raised. > >Thanks, > >William in Utah. Me. Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2.8 Fisheye) William Johnson
- RE: ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2.8 Fisheye) Peter Smith
- Re: ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2.8 Fishe... dave o'brien
- Re: ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2.8 Fisheye) Dan Scott
- Re: ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2.8 Fisheye) Anthony Farr
- Re: ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2.8 Fishe... William Robb
- Re: ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2.8 F... Lasse Karlsson
- Re: ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2... Norman Baugher
- Re: ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2.8 Fisheye) Jan van Wijk
- RE: ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2.8 Fisheye) Paul . Stregevsky
- OT: RE: ME viewfinder (was Re: Zenitar 16/2.8 F... Chris Brogden

