You may want to look at the F90X. I bought on last year as a back up AF body for my
D1,just incase it
went down, i could still shoot film at my horse shows and salvage some sales.
Its a nice camera,AF is fast and the body feels very rugged.
I found a site on the web that had a comparison of the 90X and F4(which i was going to
buy)but the
features of the 90X looked a lot better than the F4,so i bought it.
Payed around $850 Canadian with battery grip which enables verticasl shooting.
Dave
PS i'll see if i can find the site in my bookmarks
> -----Original Message-----
Original Message -----
> >> AF> From: "Patrick Pritchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>>> Hello all.
> >>>>
> >>>> I've decided that within the next year (specifically,
> >> before September
> >>>> 2005) I would like to move up to AF. This is mainly
> >> because I will be
> >>>> in Australia doing some shoots at the World Solar
> >> Challenge, where MF
> >>>> didn't quite cut it last time I was out. I'd also like to
> >> move into
> >>>> more sports, where AF would be a huge advantage.
> >>>>
> >>>> My dilemma is this:
> >>>>
> >>>> - should I stay with Pentax, or go with Nikon (I'm leaning
> >> towards a
> >>>> used F4)
> >>>> - If I stay with Pentax, should I go with PZ1P or MZ-S?
> >>>>
> >> AF> (snip)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
