You used [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the moon exposure. And with the converter attached what would the f stop equivalent be? Minus 2 stops right? We just had a conundrum of how to expose the moon properly in class, and to my surprise it was the sunny 16 rule which is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your exposure is one stop less with the converter 2 stop loss correct or were you calculating the aperture difference already when you quoted the f11? Either way I love the image and way to go!
Dave -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Double Exposure:paw Hi Boris. Thanks for the comments. Actually i did that placement on purpose,just to be a bit different. Yes the total with 2x converter would be 400mm.Not as large as i hoped but still pleasing. Dave > Hi! > > Dave, what strikes me as particularly pleasing here is that you placed > the moon in the mid bottom. The cliche/custom/majority has it either > in top left or on top right corner occupying big portion of the shot. > > You did it rather unusually and it works just fine for me... > > So, total focal length was 400 mm, right? Fascinating... > > Boris > ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]) >
