Hi Dave.
The f stop on the lens was at 5.6 which with the converter is f 11 no?
I shot this just after a long discussion on the list about moon exposure and
converters,so
i think i cal'd it
correctly.
Soooo,Shutter was 1/125,Ap at 5.6 and the 2x converter.
Sorry for the confusion.
Dave
> You used [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the moon exposure.
And with the converter attached what
> would the f stop equivalent be? Minus 2 stops right? We just had a
> conundrum of how to expose the moon properly in class, and to my surprise it
> was the sunny 16 rule which is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your exposure is one stop less with
> the converter 2 stop loss correct or were you calculating the aperture
> difference already when you quoted the f11? Either way I love the image and
> way to go!
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 10:04 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Double Exposure:paw
>
>
> Hi Boris.
> Thanks for the comments.
> Actually i did that placement on purpose,just to be a bit different.
> Yes the total with 2x converter would be 400mm.Not as large as i hoped but
> still pleasing.
>
> Dave
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Dave, what strikes me as particularly pleasing here is that you placed
> > the moon in the mid bottom. The cliche/custom/majority has it either
> > in top left or on top right corner occupying big portion of the shot.
> >
> > You did it rather unusually and it works just fine for me...
> >
> > So, total focal length was 400 mm, right? Fascinating...
> >
> > Boris
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> >
>
>
>
>
