Thanks.  I think it's a really interesting little building.  It is pretty much
in the middle of nowhere.  Just place to pull off the road.  Unfortunately, the
picture is not so interesting.  The crop is tight because 1) I lost a little
when I straightened the picture and 2) the surroundings seemed to make the
picture even less interesting.  Here's another perspective I tried.  The only
edit I've done is to level it.  (Again, I don't want the salt-water to run out
and ruin all your monitors.)

http://thornsberry.smugmug.com/gallery/88862/1/3103760/Small

So between the two pictures maybe someone can give some suggestions on how to
approach this subject, including, I guess, pass it by.

OT:  Every time I drive by this little shrine, I wonder, "What's in there?"  So,
I did step inside the door.  There were no lights and the sun was getting low on
the horizon.  Fortunately, I had the little pop-up flash on my *ist-D.  If you
are curious, here it is:(this is not a PAW, just documentation of the inside--no
need to critique) 

http://thornsberry.smugmug.com/gallery/88862/1/3103776/Small

It just sits there, unguarded and open 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2004 11:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: My second PAW


 
Hi Kevin ...

This one doesn't do much for me.  The shrine is too close to (and even clipped
by) the edge of the frame.  A little more space would help the photo quite a
bit.  Looks a little flat on my monitor, too.

shel

Kevin Thornsberry wrote:
> 
> Please forgive my posting two PAWs at one time.  I did take the first 
> PAW about a week before the second.
> 
> As with the first, I am hoping for lots of suggestions.
> 
> http://thornsberry.smugmug.com/gallery/64097/1/3095033/Medium
> 
> Before posting the picture, I rotated it slightly and applied a light 
> skew to get the tipping out of the chapel.  In retrospect, maybe it 
> has a little lean to it which I should not have altered.
> 
> Thanks for your help.


Reply via email to