>In a message dated 3/27/2004 6:33:11 AM Pacific Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please forgive my posting two PAWs at one time.  I did take the first PAW 
about
a week before the second.

As with the first, I am hoping for lots of suggestions.

http://thornsberry.smugmug.com/gallery/64097/1/3095033/Medium

Before posting the picture, I rotated it slightly and applied a light skew to
get the tipping out of the chapel.  In retrospect, maybe it has a little lean 
to
it which I should not have altered.

>Thanks for your help.

Kevin, you are really cropping your buildings awfully close -- in both #1 and 
#2. I.E. Running them very close to the edges of the frame. I think if one is 
shooting buildings, either show all of them (all the sides) or show only part 
of them (just sections that are more close up). This one, I think, also needs 
much better lighting to make it more interesting -- I prefer late day myself 
for highlighting and stronger contrast between the light and dark areas. And 
if it is out in the middle of nowhere (I think I read that), then showing the 
nowhere around it could make it look lonely or forlorn.

Just suggestions, I am not big on photographing buildings, myself, though I 
have done some. More experienced building shooters may have better ideas. But I 
think sometimes the surroundings are just as important as the buildings. 
Especially if they are older buildings out in fields or something similar. You 
might take a look at some of Ansel Adam's barn type building shots for ideas.

Marnie aka Doe 

Reply via email to