Thanks Ken. apparently frank hates us both now. btw, the vibration with the 300mm + 2x was horrible. I took about 50 shots but most showed visible camera shake. next time I must remember the cable release...
Christian Skofteland [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:37 PM Subject: Re: PAW - Yet ANOTHER bird > Only thing I can say is I wish I took it. > Good exposure @ composition. > 900mm Hmmmm. > Well done. > > Kenneth Waller > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christian Skofteland" Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2004 10:12 PM > Subject: PAW - Yet ANOTHER bird > > > > Long story short: I live next to a 500+ acre reservoir in Maryland. > > Everyday I drive past an old tree only a few hundred feet from my house > that > > is frequented by cormorants and birds of prey. Today I drove past and saw > > this: > > > > http://home.mindspring.com/~c_skofteland/id10.html > > > > The light was perfect, the bird was cooperating so grabbed the camera, > long > > lens and TCs ran back to an embankment above the water and shot about 50 > > frames. Of course the one thing I REALLY needed was the cable release > which > > I left at home. Most pictures suffered from camera shake, but I think > this > > one turned out pretty good. > > > > Comments always welcomed. > > > > Christian Skofteland > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
