Hi! TMP> Anyways, I have exactly 791 images that need my immediate attention, lots of TMP> stuff to list on Ebay (nothing photographic, don't get excited!), and heaps TMP> of sewing to do so I must get my head down and bum up and make for some TMP> productivity around here. Might go and get some chocolate first though (so TMP> much for the big health kick, I am supposed to be on as I try to get fit for TMP> GFM. I think I'll just sit and eat chocolate, adding to my no longer bony TMP> butt, and watch you all jog around the mountain! Plus, I'll be suffering jet TMP> lag anyways so that can be my excuse! lol)...
One of thoughts that kept occurring to me was that I with digital I won't have to spend time scanning stuff. But you scare me, Tanya, I have about 5 films that I'd like to scan. It means that I would have to scan total of 25 or so frames - say half dozen the best of the best of each film. But you have 50 times as many images to worry about... I wish I was about to experience jet lag from the same reason you're going to... Well, may be another time. Tanya, do you have by chance Pentax FA 100/3.5 macro with matching 1:1 accessory? I may be looking for one <g>... Just my cents... Boris ([EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED])
