Jostein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >One way to solve that is to specify a standard resolution for the judges to view >it at. For example, if they are going to view it with a projector, a 1024x768 >pixel resolution is reasonable. This will pretty much remove all the >differences between cameras.
Good idea. But what about the participants who don't know how to do this (yes, there *are* some who would fall into this category) or who do know how but don't bring a computer with them? >What's more interesting is how to relate to computer processing before >submission. Indeed. If an image has been resized, there's no telling what else might have been done to it (and downsizing would hide most visible manipulation artifacts). -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com
