I visited Vancouver's zoo several years ago.  Then I read that the zoo was
voted out of existence.  There was an aquarium in the same area.  I wonder
if that still exists.

Jim A.
> From: John Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:35:22 +0100
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Greater Vancouver Zoo
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 14:34:37 -0400
> 
> I think the bars force us to reflect on the fact that these creatures of
> the wild have been imprisoned for our entertainment.  Perhaps there are
> good reasons for it, perhaps not.
> 
> John
> 
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:13:34 -0700, Shel Belinkoff
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Alan ...
>> 
>> I don't like these at all.  The fence between the viewer and
>> the animals really detracts from the critters.  Better would
>> have been to get closer, stick a smaller lens through the
>> fence, if at all possible, or get much closer to the fence
>> and use whatever lens you had wide open or close to it,
>> obscuring the fence completely.  Baring those options, these
>> are probably as good as you could get, and was a good
>> exercise in hand holding longer lenses ... which you seem to
>> have done quite well.
>> 
>> Others might like the idea of the fence being there, but,
>> imo, it makes for very poor photographs.
>> 
>> shel
>> 
>> Alan Chan wrote:
>>> 
>>> Had a few hours walk this Saturaday and took some pictures. To my
>>> surprise,
>>> I was able to take sharp pictures by handholding my 200mm & 300mm.
>>> Camera
>>> shake used to be a problem with me so I usually had the tripod with me,
>>> but
>>> not this time (left in the car because of the weight). Any comments
>>> welcome.
>>> :-)
>>> 
>>> http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/vancouver_zoo
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/
> 

Reply via email to