I concur with Shel wrt fence. It's a real distraction.
I've taken a few zoopix over the years, and I realize that it's often either fence, or no pic.
Looks like it was not such a good idea then.
OTOH, that shot of the buzzards or whatever type of ugly bird they are, is pretty cool. And, yes, they're pretty damned sharp. Better than I coulda done, that's for sure. That one's my favourite of the bunch.
Actually this pic was shot through the fence too, but the lens was stick so close to the fence they aren't visible in the picture.
The ring-tailed lemurs (or whatever they are - any lower-primate-looking mammal with a ringed tail is a ring-tailed lemur to me) are sharp enough, but they really aren't doing much interesting imho. Not a bad shot, just not so interesting. But, as Shel said, if the exercise is one in handholding a long lens steady, you were most successful.
I have a good excuse for this - the glass window was dirty. <g>
Regards, Alan Chan http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_________________________________________________________________
Free yourself from those irritating pop-up ads with MSn Premium. Get 2months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines
