Gee,
I was pretty close then...
Couldn't argument for my guess though, so it serves me little credit...:-)

Cheers,
Jostein

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 9:06 PM
Subject: Name that capture? - ANSWER


> Not exactly right but close enough.  Sorry there was no prize.
>
> Camera - 60 yr old 4x5 speed graphic with focal plne shutter, $125
> Lens - 40 yr old Wollensak 115mm F12.5 "Micro-Raptar", coated, but not MC,
> $50
>
> Total cost lens and camera a whopping $175.
>
> I shot the image to test two things at once. Mainly the film which
> was over 3 years outdated, and secondly the lens which I had never
> tried with color.
>
> Film - Kodak 4x5 Portra 160NC outdated, 1/2001 ( I got this film for
> nothing )
> Exposure - Open Flash, Effective aperture F50, not a typo, eff-fifty
> Scanned with a epson 3200 at 1600 dpi for a master file approx 50 Mpixels
> Lens was extended to approx 180mm via bellows for a magnification of
> approx 1:2
>
> Looks to me like both the lens and the film are fine, but even at f50,
> there wasnt enough DOF to get everything sharp in a setup like this.
>
> Thanks to all for guessing, it was kinda fun hearing the guesses and the
> logic
> behind them. I think this pretty much proves you dont need a lot of money
> or latest technology to get some really good results.  Modern films
> certainly help the situation.
>
> http://jcoconnell.com/temp/macro01s.jpg (0.7 Mpixels compressed)
>
> JCO
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>    J.C. O'Connell   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://jcoconnell.com
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 1:49 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Name that capture?
>
>
> I think this is shot with a cheap old large format press camera on low ISO
> negative film.
>
> Gotta guess something...:-)
>
> Jostein
>

Reply via email to