So, yes, a photograph is an image. Your transportation analogy is a good one, Rob.
I ~never~ say, "I'm going to take my transportation over to your place", I say I'll take my bike.
So, why do so many do that with the word "image"? Why are camera shops suddenly becoming "Imaging Centres"? <shudder>
cheers, frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Semi OT-Street Photography survey Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 03:22:08 +1000
On 22 Apr 2004 at 9:53, Keith Whaley wrote:
> Hey, Shel, no problem here! "Images" for digital, and "photographs" for > film. > I think I've always followed that personal preference...
To my mind they are all images, like ship/plane/cars are transport.
Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/ Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
_________________________________________________________________ http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID=1994&DI=1034&SU=http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines
